From 9fans@cse.psu.edu Thu Oct 19 14:27:07 EDT 1995
Article: 660 of comp.os.plan9
Xref: cannon.ecf comp.os.plan9:660
Newsgroups: comp.os.plan9
Path: cannon.ecf!utnut!cs.utexas.edu!academ!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!EU.net!uknet!dcl-cs!bath.ac.uk!ccsis
From: schwartz@plan9.CSe.psu.EDU
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <95Oct18.175453edt.78400@colossus.cse.psu.edu>
Sender: ccsis@bath.ac.uk (Icarus Sparry)
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Organization: Plan 9 mailing list
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 13:47:33 GMT
Approved: plan9mod@bath.ac.uk
Lines: 15
Status: RO

I noticed that srv sometimes gives unhelpful error messages.
Inspection reveals that there are uninitialized variables due to
goto-lossage.  Suggested improvement:

term% diff srv.c srv.c.orig
74d73
< 	strcpy(dest, *argv);
90a90,91
> 	strcpy(dest, *argv);
> 
124c125
< 		fprint(2, "srv %s: mount(%s) failed: %s\n", dest, mtpt, err);
---
> 		fprint(2, "srv %s: mount failed: %s\n", dest, err);