About the CentreInteractive Online HandbookCoursesOnline Booking
 
The proposal is one of the most important forms of writing engineers do.  Successful proposals lead to jobs, products and profit.  Unsuccessful proposals lead nowhere.  This document presents the basics of proposals:

The Goal

While style and structure of proposals vary, successful proposals require Attitude.
A successful proposal convinces the reader that:
 "Convincing" makes many engineers uncomfortable because they think good science should convince by itself; however, you must still persuade the reader that your science is good. Convince the reader that you have thought through the problem and have a workable solution.

The Audience

No one ever paid a consultant to tell him what he already knew.  Your audience needs to know something.   You need to explain the problem clearly, and to provide full background to give context to your solution. Remember the readers need

Structure of the Proposal

Six Basic Elements:
1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction
3. Project Description or Program
4. Timeline and Milestones
5. Budget
6. Qualifications

The Executive Summary

The executive summary is a short, information-packed summary of the proposal.  In one or two paragraphs, state the purpose of the proposal, the essentials of the program and the total expense of the budget.  This should not exceed one page.  A reader should finish the summary knowing the basic information.  Only an interested reader needs to read more. Write the executive summary after you have finished the rest of the report.
  Sample of an Executive Summary (Slightly modified from the original)
 
Executive Summary 

(1) Memory management is a crucial factor in operating system and application performance. (2) The purpose of this project is to study of the relative merits of the best fit and worst fit selection algorithms used in memory management.  (3) The first goal of the project is to produce a reference table with the test sets and results for software developers using algorithms. (4) The second goal is to develop a very specific set of rules for when to use each algorithm. (5) The results will be valuable to software developers when choosing between the best fit and worst fit selection algorithms. (6) While the first goal can be attained in the ten week period, attaining the second goal will depend on the results of the data. (7) Consequently, the second goal may be unreachable, or require further research. (8) The cost for the ten week period is $7500. 

Notes 
  1. The first sentence gives some context by defining terms. It could be improved by adding the simple word "computer" to separate this study from something in cognitive ergonomics.
  2. The project's goals are clearly stated in the second, third and fourth sentences.
  3. The value of the project is outlined in sentence five.
  4. The limitation or scope of the work is presented in sentences six and seven.
  5. The cost is explained in the last sentence. Note that the cost is for ten weeks regardless of whether the second goal is attained.
  6. This summary does not include the writer's qualifications, presumably because the writer is a student who has no experience in this kind of work.

Introduction

One major problem students have is blurring Executive Summaries and Introductions. NEVER assume that the reader of the introduction has already read the executive summary.  In other words, the executive summary just repeats
  1. State the purpose (make it clear that you are proposing something).

    Define the opportunity or problem.  Usually, you need to begin by explaining the situation: what circumstances led to the proposal (e.g. an industrial sponsor's problem)?  Consider the following:


    • Decide what facts best support the project.
    • Determine whether it is reasonable to portray the need as acute.
    • Explain how your project relates to similar projects that preceded it.
    • Avoid circular reasoning.

  2. Explain useful background. e.g. What engineering principles will guide your solution?  Even if you think your reader knows this information, show the reader that you understand it too. (Sometimes, background is separated into a separate section.  If you do this, put the background after the overview.)

  3. Give a brief overview of the contents of the whole proposal.  (For example, in the introduction to the "structure of the proposal" here, six basic elements are listed.  These are then elaborated in later sections.  A similar kind of brief sketch will help a proposal reader.)

This is what a first draft of an introduction might look like (if you were working on MIE 240 in Fall 1998).  Notice that there are a number of  questions whose answers might help develop really good opening context.
 

The market for backpacks is huge.  Students throughout North America from ages 5-25 carry backpacks to school.  [find out sales figures?]  Many need to replace their backpacks each year due to frayed straps or broken zippers. [survey users to discover complaints about existing backpacks?] Therefore, any company that can produce and market a product that is cheap and/or high quality will be able to find a market niche. [analyze what determines cost? materials? place of manufacture? distance to market?]  This proposal will outline a product that will fill the need for a high quality yet affordable product appropriate for university students.

The Project Description or Program

State explicitly what you propose to do.  Some also include a "scope" statement ÷ an explicit statement of what you will not be doing to help limit the task. Explain your approach to the problem in detail.  Some of the following questions might be useful: Included in your program you should have three subsections: objectives, methods, and evaluation. You do not need to use these sections as subheadings, but you do need to clearly explain all three aspects of the project.
OBJECTIVES
Your objectives must be tangible, specific, concrete, measurable, and achievable in a specified time period.
 
 Currently, software developers have only a general description and understanding of how the algorithms work in deciding which algorithm is more appropriate for their application. I propose to quantify the performance of each algorithm given varying sets of memory requests. This data will allow developers to compare the performance trade off of each algorithm based on the expected memory request set for their application. 
Objectives can come in several varieties:
  1. Behavioral ÷ A human action is anticipated.
    1.  
      Software developers will be able to compare the performance trade off of each algorithm based on the expected memory request set for their application. 

  2. Performance ÷ A specific time frame within which a behavior will occur, at an expected proficiency level, is expected.
    1.  
      Software developers will be able to compare the performance trade off of each algorithm based on the expected memory request set for their application.  This efficiency will cut the time for testing new applications by 40%. 

  3. Process ÷ The manner in which something occurs is an end in itself.

  4. Product ÷ A tangible item results.
    1.  
      The first goal of the project is to produce a reference table with the test sets and results for software developers using algorithms. The second goal is the development of a very specific set of rules for when to use each algorithm. While the first goal can be attained in the ten week period, attaining the second goal will depend on the results of the data. 
METHODS
In your program, you need to do the following:
EVALUATION
Building evaluation into a project is an important part of engineering design.  You need to consider how you will evaluate whether the project is successful.  How will you measure whether the project meets its goal?  By including a mechanism for evaluation in your proposal, you indicate that achieving objective is a serious goal.  You also provide the best means for others to learn from your experience. Two types of Formal Evaluation are common
  1. Measuring the product (e.g. test a computer program's performance under various conditions for versatility, accuracy, speed, etc.)
  2. Analyzing the process (e.g. analyze the milestones such as the ability of a prototype to integrate with other components of a project)
Either or both might be appropriate
 

Some Pointers on Using Research Sources

For detail, see our section on Documenting Sources. See particularly, using Author Date format or using IEEE

So what exactly do I have to document?

a. Quotations, paraphrases, or summaries
b. Specific facts used as evidence for your argument or interpretation
c. Distinctive or authoritative ideas, whether you agree with them or not
For a detailed answer to this question see our page on "Plagiarism"

Return to Top

Last modified . Site designed and maintained by Engineering Communication Centre Staff.